Archive for the ‘Ph04 Species Justice’ Category

NPWS Habitat Reduction Season

Tuesday, April 30th, 2024

The bush arson cult

 

It’s Autumn in the Greater Blue Mountains, and the New South Wales Government’s bush arsonists are out in full swing deliberately setting fire to native habitat at every opportunity.  Governmental ‘Habitat Reduction Season‘!     

Is this pastime not comparable with the antiquated British imported tradition of the ‘Duck Season‘ – killing NATIVE ducks that is – just for sport.  It’s the very same time of year!  

 

“Capital climes for rough shooting old sport, what!  Live on peg,  we ought to bag a few dozen before tea.”

 

On Monday 25th March 2024, the NSW Government’s National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) published a media release about its continuing “hazard” reduction burns across the Blue Mountains National Park.   It read as follows (main extracts):

 

“The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) has announced plans for an 850-hectare hazard reduction burn in the Glenbrook area of Blue Mountains National Park, set to commence on 26 March, weather conditions permitting. This preventive measure is part of a strategic effort to reduce the risk of wildfires and protect surrounding communities.

Scheduled to unfold over consecutive days, the operation targets the reduction of naturally accumulated fuel loads in the park. The primary aim is to provide strategic protection for the residential areas of Glenbrook, Lapstone, and Mulgoa against potential future wildfires.

…This burn is a component of the comprehensive hazard reduction program carried out by NPWS each year, often in collaboration with the Rural Fire Service and Fire and Rescue NSW. These operations are crucial for managing vegetation fuel loads and reducing the intensity and spread of potential wildfires.

The planned hazard reduction burns in Blue Mountains National Park underscore the ongoing commitment of NSW authorities to wildfire risk management and community safety. By taking proactive measures to manage fuel loads, the NPWS aims to mitigate the impact of wildfires, ensuring the protection of both natural landscapes and residential communities.”

 

Our comments to this bush arson justification spin doctoring:

 

  1. The above is bush arson propaganda by contracted consultants with Communications Degrees, justifying the perpetual decimation of Australia’s native habitat since the first day of colonisation and usurpation of the continent since 1788. Nothing has changed or is likely to.  Surviving intact wilderness has become reduced to mere islands.  Just go to Google Maps  [See our extract map below]
  2. 850 hectares” is an area equivalent to about 30km x 30km   (√ 850ha).  In relative terms, that’s three times the size of Sydney’s CBD, a native habitat area capacity for many fauna;
  3. preventive measure is part of a strategic effort to reduce the risk of wildfires” – this is because when wildfires do occur the NSW Government invariably fails to (A) detect, (B) respond and (C) extinguish the ignitions promptly whilst small and controllable.   It has an attitude that native habitat has a lower value than human habitat.  In contrast,  the urban Fire and Rescue Service is tasked to (B) respond and (C) extinguish the ignitions involving human property immediately, and unlike their unpaid volunteer Rural Fire Service (RFS) counterparts, they get paid to do it;
  4. protect surrounding communities”  – this means human communities that have been built encroaching more and more into and usurping native habitat.  These human “communities” are the only focus of the NPWS and its support RFS.  Under this culture, wildlife communities matter not, irrespective of any threatened species impacted/killed.  This attitude belies an antiquated anthropocentric mentality.  Neither the NPWS nor the RFS employ an Ecologist.   They just don’t care about protecting Ecology – in this case forest ecology;
  5. the operation targets the reduction of naturally accumulated fuel loads in the park“.  That’s right, the NPWS as delegated custodial organisation ‘manager’ of the Blue Mountains National Park treats native habitat and its dependent fauna within such national parks in NSW (one of some 800) instead as “fuel loads” to be reduced to sterile urban park status. NPWS should be relegated to managing urban parks like Hyde Park in Sydney’s CBD;
  6. The primary aim is to provide strategic protection for the residential areas of Glenbrook, Lapstone, and Mulgoa against potential future wildfires.”  – this is a reinforcement approach of our Point 3;
  7. …This burn is a component of the comprehensive hazard reduction program carried out by NPWS each year, often in collaboration with the Rural Fire Service and Fire and Rescue NSW.” –  this is a reinforcement approach of our Point 3;
  8.  “These operations are crucial for managing vegetation fuel loads and reducing the intensity and spread of potential wildfires.” – “crucial” for whom?  An expanding Sydney human housing sprawl?  So the NSW Government’s volunteer and under-resourced RFS has less forested native habitat risk and so less work to do in the event of wildfires because year-on-year there is less forested native habitat left.  Perpetuation that long term strategy, there will eventually be little or no native habitat left across NSW.  So down the track a future NSW Government may well decide that the RFS is therefore no longer needed and so make the organisation redundant.   Sydney that has been deliberately morphed by successive governments (state and federal) into the ‘Greater Sydney Region‘ has, on paper, swallowed whole the ‘Blue Mountains Region‘ (see NSW Planning map below) , presuming its world heritage status is now just outer-upper western Sydney parkland for the rezoning offing.   Allowing the 2019 megafires to incinerate 80% of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area, clearly has achieved the NSW Government’s intended devaluation of the UNESCO recognised “Outstanding Universal Value” of all the Eucalypts, and is wholly consistent with a usurpation agenda for an even Greater Sydney megalopolis.
  9. The planned hazard reduction burns in Blue Mountains National Park underscore the ongoing commitment of NSW authorities to wildfire risk management and community safety. By taking proactive measures to manage fuel loads, the NPWS aims to mitigate the impact of wildfires, ensuring the protection of both natural landscapes and residential communities.”  The spin doctoring clearly by outsourced consultants with Communication Degrees is palpable here.   It’s more repetition of contrived persuasive terms: “planned hazard reduction burns”,   underscore the “ongoing commitment of NSW authorities to wildfire risk management and community safety”.   Ask the residents of Mount Wilson who lost their homes by RFS reckless arson in 2019 on this point!  “taking proactive measures to manage fuel loads”, “the NPWS aims to mitigate the impact of wildfires”, “ensuring the protection of both natural landscapes and residential communities.”  What so burning the natural landscapes to protect them?  Seriously?  In truth it is all about avoiding bad publicity when the RFS lights a high risk fire on 14th December 2014 causing homes to be incinerated like at Mount Wilson.  “The state coroner has confirmed that a bushfire that destroyed homes in Mt Wilson, Mt Tomah, Berambing and Bilpin in December 2019 was caused after a planned RFS backburn jumped Mt Wilson Road.”   [SOURCE:  ‘Bushfire inquiry: Mt Wilson backburn to blame‘, BMG, 2nd April 2024]

 

 

 

RFS MOUNT WILSON ARSON:  Sam Ramaci, like several of his neighbours, claims a back-burn lit by the RFS on December 14, 2019, was responsible for the destruction of his cool room, tractor and the property that was to fund his retirement. “If they hadn’t started the back-burn, my house would be still standing,” he said.  (The NSW Government has refused to compensate him and others (nor even apologise) for the reckless misjudgment of its RFS – a NSW Government agency.  Who can afford a class action?  [Go to Video Link]

 

The Mount Wilson fire was the sixth backburn to escape along the southern containment line that was intended to protect the upper Blue Mountains from the Gospers Mountain Fire.

[Source:  ‘The best of a bad choice’: Megablaze was artificially enlarged by the Rural Fire Service’, 20231219, By Harriet Alexander, Sydney Morning Herald, ^https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-best-of-a-bad-choice-megablaze-was-artificially-enlarged-by-the-rural-fire-service-20231214-p5eren.html]

 

What sane person would join the Rural Fire Starters?

Bush arsonists have a psychological compulsion to set fire to see fire .  It’s a ritual – they’re eyes light up.  “Behold, The Fiery Cross !...”

 

NPWS is beholden to NSW Planning 

 

A headline environmental protection agency that is supposed to be caring for national parks reporting to a state land use planning authority (aka Development).  Is this a warped governmental portfolio conflict of interest of what?  Liberal-Labor-Liberal…?   Same Same.

 

The Regional Map of NSW according to the NSW Government’s Department of Planning and Environment fiefdom in 2024. Note that the Blue Mountains Region no longer exists, but has become annexed by the ever expanding ‘Greater Sydney Region’ in the mindset of Macquarie Street’s urban expansionism campaign.  Mount Victoria a Sydney suburb now?  Lookout Broken Hill!

 

 

Deforestation of Australia since colonisation and its usurpation from 1788. Remnant native forests and their native habitat have been decimated to ecologically unsustainable islands.  The entire pre-colonial eastern seaboard of the continent was originally blanketed by native forests  unbroken, extending about 600km inland.     [SOURCE Google Maps – satellite view, April 2024]

It’s no wonder that Australia continues its record of perpetuating the world’s worst rate of wildlife extinctions.  It’s akin to countries like Madagascar.  It’s all hell bent on serving the Human Plague Order, currently 8.1 Billion! and in 2024 growing (and demanding more) by $75 million p.a.  The current population of Australia is 26,654,200 as of Monday, April 29, 2024.  Compare Australia’s Federation census of 1901 counted 3,773,801 people across Australia.   [Check:  Census Bureau Projects U.S. and World Populations on New Year’s Day; and ^https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/]

 

But wait there’s more bush arson planned…

 

An update last Friday, 26th April 2024 (just days ago), the NSW Government’s environmental department website again posted a media release advising of its further planned “Hazard reduction burn in Blue Mountains National Park” for the weekend. 

It read as follows:

“The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) with assistance from the NSW Rural Fire Service is conducting a hazard reduction burn in Blue Mountains National Park starting Sunday 28 April, weather permitting.

Staff from Metro South West and Blue Mountains regions undertaking the Pisgah Ridge hazard reduction burn near Glenbrook in the Blue Mountains National Park
The hazard reduction burn will focus on an area south of Woodford, in the mid-mountains, and cover a total area of about 400 hectares. The burn aims to reduce fuel hazards and assist in the protection of property in the surrounding Woodford, Hazelbrook and Linden areas.

Fire trails around the burn area, including Bedford Creek, will be closed to the public, along with the Murphy’s Glen camping and day use area.
The campground will be reopen when it is safe to do so.

Smoke may be seen in the area for up to a week after the initial operation.

The burn is one of many hazard reduction operations undertaken by NPWS each year, many with the assistance of the NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS) and Fire and Rescue NSW.

All burns around the state are coordinated with the NSW RFS to ensure the impact on the community is assessed at a regional level.

People with known health conditions can sign up to receive air quality reports, forecasts and alerts via email or SMS from the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. For health information relating to smoke from bushfires and hazard reduction burns, visit NSW Health or Asthma Australia.

More information on hazard reduction activities is available at NSW Rural Fire Service and the NSW Government’s Hazards Near Me website and app.”

 

Asthma sufferers? –  NSW Government care factor?   

Carbon emissions? –  NSW Government care factor?

 

10th December 2019:  NPWS world heritage Eucalyptus woodsmoke enveloping Sydney from what started as an abandoned pile burn off Army Road near Gospers Mountain in the distant Wollemi NP two months prior on 26th October 2019.   She’ll be right, eh NPWS boss David Crust?

 

The RFS is one of the planet’s highest emitters of airborne carbon particulates by way of causing mass wood-smoke by repeatedly lighting bushfires and ignoring wildfires.  Wood smoke we feel is a tad more polluting than humans exhaling carbon dioxide. But then how many humans on the planet?

Yet the climate change cult remains quiet on this more serious global problem.  Why so selective about a lesser pollutant in the hysterical ideology that has morphed from ‘Global Warming‘ (Wallace Smith Broecker’s term of 1975) to ‘The Greenhouse Effect‘ (Mike Hulme’s term in 1994) to ‘Climate Change Scientology‘ (U.S. National Academies of 2014) to currently ‘Climate Crisis‘ actually predating the former (U.S Vice President Al Gore of 2007). 

The RFS and NPWS press on regardless – as it’s not carbon dioxide, so all good!

 

Here’s the latest bush arson schedule to further set fire to the still unburnt native habitat of the Blue Mountains: 

 

RFS:   “It’s ok love, it’s good for the bush. She’ll be right.”

 

It’s an age old mentality of the fox charged to look after the chickens.  Both the NPWS and RFS have a cultural attitude that the national parks are NOT to be protected, despite the NPWS delegated to so-called manage NATIONAL parks across New South Wales (NSW).  That is despite the Rural Fire Service (RFS) charged with putting out wildfires.

That perverted culture is conditioned to regard native habitat only as a ‘fuel’ that burns and so NOT habitat but a ‘hazard’ to be controlled and burned to prevent it burning.   If there is no habitat  left, then the meathead rationale, no hazard, so job done!  Of recent times the spin doctors in government seconded as contractors with Communications Degrees (aka the art of spin) have softened the community sell of these ‘hazard reductions’ to ‘prescribed burns” to justify and take some noble authority from on high that the BUSH WAS ORDERED TO BE BURNED, WE HAVE NO CHOICE !  

All their fire trucks are filled with more flammable liquids light a bushfire than water to put it out.  ‘RFS’ should stand for for Rural Fire Starters.

Blue Mountains World Heritage?

 

Eventually the bush grows back but with a vastly different flora community make up.  The biodiversity is gone.  The wildlife don’t come back from the dead.

 

One of countless Koalas tragically burned to death in her native habitat during the Blue Mountains megafires of 2019.  They won’t come back. [This website is not suitable for children to view]

 

This native Koala would have looked something like this:

National parks throughout Australia over the 236 years since colonisation and its continent-wide deforestation, land use destruction and introduced bushfires, have consistently and hatefully  made Australia’s ecological landscape very very quiet and devoid of wildlife.

The 2019 mega bushfires of NSW that the NPWS and RFS let get out of control over months, wiped out 80% of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area, including rare remnant koala  communities and hosts of other at-risk wildlife and their special native habitat that NPWS has no clue of the statistical losses.  NPWS does not manage, it mismanages, else just oversees politically drive projects like multi-million dollar tourists track upgrades to benefit humans.   The NSW State Government tasked to look after UNESCO world heritage on behalf of the Australia Government?

This habitat reduction regime is to burn the remaining 20% that didn’t cop the 2019 wildfire megablaze.  They call this “stewardship”?  All trust in the NSW Government to protect world heritage has long gone out the window.

 

The ‘NPWS’ is a misnomer   

 

‘NPWS” is an abbreviation for the National Parks and Wildlife Service in the state of New South Wales. 

Logo of the NPWS

 

The problem is that this government bureaucracy is supposed to be the governmental (public) custodian for national parks is misleading:

  1. NPWS is not national, rather it is only a NSW governmental sub-department.  Governmental ‘management’ of national parks is not national, rather each state and territory has its own national parks, and the Australian Government is not involved – so a bizarre and misleading naming tradition;
  2. NPWS does NOT look after wildlife.   Native habitat in these ‘national parks’ is supposed to be protected. Yet every year vast selected areas are burnt deliberately else left to burn on a grand scale, so killing wildlife and destroying their habitat. 

As a consequence, the NPWS deserves to be more appropriately renamed as ‘NSW Parks Service‘ just like in Victoria, the Victorian Government calls its equivalent ‘Parks Victoria‘.

On the relevant NSW Government’s website pertaining to its NPWS, it explains that the NPWS is part of  a sub-department called ‘Environment and Heritage, which in turn: 

“Environment and Heritage is part of the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.

Our vision is for a thriving, sustainable and resilient New South Wales.Environment and Heritage works with communities, businesses and governments to protect, preserve and strengthen the quality of our natural environment and heritage. We do this through active stewardship that supports a healthy New South Wales.We are committed to creating thriving environments, communities and economies that benefit the people of New South Wales.”

SOURCE:   ^https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are

 

The three most trendy feel-good terms above include:  “thriving”, “resilient” , active stewardship”.  Pure motherhoodism by the contracted young spin doctors with a Communications Degree.    So where are the published wildlife regional extinction stats before and after the Blue Mountains 2019 megablaze? 

 

Recall Tathra Sunday 18 March 2018, the consequence of the RFS deliberately lighting a bushfire on a 38 degree Celsius (100 Fahrenheit) gusty day upwind of this coastal village. [Read Our Article: ‘Bushfire Scenario Was Not Rocket Science

 


 

Further Reading:

[All accessed 20240430]

 

[1]  ‘Blue Mountains‘, Local Alerts, NPWS website, ^https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/blue-mountains-national-park/local-alerts

 

[2]  ‘Blue Mountains National Park, Current alerts in this area‘, (last reviewed: Tue 30 April 2024, 9.49pm), ^https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/blue-mountains-national-park/local-alerts

 

[3]   ‘Hazard reduction burns continue across Blue Mountains National Park‘, 20240325 NPWS,

^https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/news/hazard-reduction-burns-continue-across-blue-mountains-national-park#:~:text=The%20NSW%20National%20Parks%20and,week%2C%20beginning%20Tuesday%2026%20March.

 

[4]   ‘Hazard reduction burn in Blue Mountains National Park‘, 20240426, NPWS,  ^https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/news/hazard-reduction-burn-in-blue-mountains-national-park-28-april

 

[5]  ‘Hazard Reduction Burns Scheduled in Blue Mountains National Park to Mitigate Wildfire Risks‘, 20240325, by Mau Mendoza, Modern Campground website, ^https://moderncampground.com/australia/hazard-reduction-burns-scheduled-in-blue-mountains-national-park-to-mitigate-wildfire-risks/

 

[6]  ‘Western Ride HR‘, NPWS, ^https://www.abc.net.au/emergency/warning/nsw/AUREMER-0479ff79feccc8e54815994214aa5ff9

 

[7]  ‘Crossing the Blue Mountains‘ (school excursion), Stage 2 (Years 3-4), History, Blue Mountains National Park, NPWS website , ^https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/education/stage-2-hsie-crossing-the-mountains-mt-york-blue-mountains-national-park/local-alerts

 

[8]   ‘Impact of the 2019-20 Mega-Fires on the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area, New South Wales‘, 20221129, by P Smith and J Smith, Issue Vol. 144 (2022),  Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, ^https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/LIN/article/view/17079

 

[9]  ‘Fires Near Me‘, (webpage), accessed 20240430, by Rural Fire Service (NSW Government department), ^https://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/fire-information/fires-near-me

 

[10]   ‘RFS Blue Mountains District‘, (The official page of the NSW Rural Fire Service Blue Mountains District), Facebook, ^https://www.facebook.com/RFSBlueMountainsDistrict/

 

[11]   ‘Hazard Reduction Burning Program‘, by NSW NPWS, (video on YouTube) ^https://youtu.be/IL50aYkTKIs

 

[12]   ‘NSW Rural Fire Service addressed a ‘wounded’ community seeking an apology after ill-fated back-burn‘, 20220916, by

 

[13]   ‘The best of a bad choice’: Megablaze was artificially enlarged by the Rural Fire Service‘, 20231219, by Harriet Alexander, Sydney Morning Herald, ^https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-best-of-a-bad-choice-megablaze-was-artificially-enlarged-by-the-rural-fire-service-20231214-p5eren.html

 

[14]   ‘The day Sydney choked: Smoke forces drastic measures in harbour city‘, 20191210, by Matt O’SullivanAnna Patty and Peter Hannam, Sydney Morning Herald, ^https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-day-sydney-choked-smoke-forces-drastic-measures-in-harbour-city-20191210-p53ik8.html

 

[15]   ‘Zoned Employment Land – Regional News South Wales‘, January 2022, Regional NSW Zoned Employment Lands Map’, NSW Department of Planning and Environment,  ^https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/research-and-demography/employment-lands/employment-lands-development-monitor/regional-nsw-zoned-employment-lands-map

 

[16]   ‘Census Bureau Projects U.S. and World Populations on New Year’s Day‘, 20240103, U.S Department of Commerce, ^https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2024/01/census-bureau-projects-us-and-world-populations-new-years-day#:~:text=The%20projected%20world%20population%20on,the%20U.S.%20and%20world%20populations.

 

[17]   ‘Current World Population‘, Worldometer (website),  ^https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

 

As at 30th April 2024

 

Blue Mountains: Faulconbridge native cleansing

Monday, December 26th, 2011
A native Scribbly Gum of Faulconbridge, Blue Mountains, Australia
…perhaps over 200 years old, healthy and in its natural setting.
(Photo by Editor 20111226, free in public domain, click photo to enlarge)

.

.…but simply because land developers want to destroy the bush for selfish housing, they legally claim the tree is ‘potentially dangerous’
It seems the New South Wales Court Commissioner has sympathised and condemned the tree to a chainsaw death.
(Photo by Editor 20111226, free in public domain, click photo to enlarge)

.

Court Presumptuous?

.

The New South Wales Land (before) Environment Court has demonised and stigmatised this native Eucalypt tree as a “hybrid” (i.e. as a ‘half cast’ in human terms).   The Acting Commissioner has ruled a death warrant upon this native old growth Eucalypt in its natural bushland setting on the following three bases:

..

Basis #1.   Blue Mountains ‘Significant Tree’ protection ignores claims of a tree being somehow dangerous (however contrived, false and self-servingly malicious the rationale)

.

While the provisions of (Blue Mountains Council’s) Development Control Plan (DCP) 9 must be considered as a fundamental element in the decision process…it does not necessarily follow that the tree should be retained under any circumstances.  

“DCP 9 is silent on how to address trees that are potentially dangerous or unhealthy although Clause 6 provides the opportunity to “cut down”… any tree on the Register of Significant Trees” but with the consent of Council.” 

(Ed:  Blue Mountains Council had unanimously rejected the development application – so the ‘acting’ Commissioner is presuming any real opportunity and by raising such weak argument is siding with the developer).

.

Basis #2.   The ‘acting’ Commissioner rejects the tree’s scenic quality instantly without due consideration and with a presumed fear of trees

.

Accepting that the Hybrid adds to the scenic quality of the site and the surrounding area, this benefit needs to be balanced against the likely longevity of the tree and its health.  (Ed:  The Court has no grounds for estimating the longevity of this tree, and seems to be surmising on the basis of personal prejudice).

In this case, I have little trouble in concluding that the  balance falls in favour of the removal of the tree .  The conclusions of the two tomograph (xray) tests and the evidence of Dr McDonald and Mr James, and supported by the council officer, leave little doubt as to the appropriate outcome.

(Ed: Tomograph tests and evidence withheld in Court decision, so how do we know the tree is unhealthy?)

“I do not accept that the retention of the tree, irrespective of the scenic quality links to the area, should be preferred when there is a serious and legitimate question over the safety of the tree.  (Ed:  The “serious and legitimate question over the safety of the tree” is unsubstantiated and appears presumptive).

“In my view, the overwhelming expert and scientific evidence clearly suggests that the tree is dangerous and presents an unsafe situation for future ocupants of the site.”

(Ed:  ‘Overwhelming‘ from what independent qualified and scientifically relevant source and where is the report?  The ‘acting‘ Commissioner’s presumption of ‘future occupants of the site‘ suggests a high probability of judicial bias).

.

Basis #3.   Tree canopies are inconsistent with housing safety

.

“Even if a dwelling is constructed outside of the area covered by the tree canopy, I am not satisfied that (it) sufficiently overcomes the potential danger from the tree.  It would be clearly impractical to fence off the area under the canopy, given the limited area remaining for a dwelling on the site and the need to provide ancillary matters such as private open space and building setbacks.”  (Ed:  The Court is prejudging that the developer proposal for dwellings (x2) and proposed private open space and building setbacks have precedent values over the natural values of pre-existicng native bushland including a Council-protected significant mature native tree, native vegetation and bushrock).

“The suggestion by Ms Hobley that a dwelling could be located underneath the (tree) canopy is misconceived, given the weight of evidence for branch failure and which is supported by the obvious example where an existing branch has failed and only remains because it is held up by another tree on the site.  I am not satisfied that Ms Hobley has given proper consideration to the potential for injury in her assessment of the tree.”

.

(Ed:   The ‘acting’ Commissioner conveys an preconceived view that trees are dangerous.  Details of “an existing branch” failing are not available in the Court’s decision.)

.

A native Eucalypt, condemned as a ‘hybrid’
by those who themselves are but hybrid descendants of colonists
because human invasion is enshrined in law as having a superior value than existing native old growth.   
(Photo by Editor 20111226, free in public domain, click photo to enlarge)

.

The Habitat Advocate is pleased to support the efforts of local people in Faulconbridge trying to save this grand native tree from being killed.  For further information visit:  ^http://savethetree.org/

.


.

Native Cleansing’

.

Clearing native trees for human development is a value judgment of convenience.  Philosophically native tree cleansing is no different to ethic cleansing of one human ethic group of another.

 

Native forest deforestation (ethnic cleansing)
– at record levels across New South Wales

.

‘Ethnic Cleansing’ is a process in which advancing army of one ethnic group expels civilians of other ethnic groups from towns and villages it conquers in order to create ethnically pure enclaves for members of their ethnic group.

‘Serbian military commander in Bosnia, a war criminal sought by the War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, Ratko Mladic, sometimes issued specific orders to his subordinates to shell a particular village more than others, because there is less Serbs and more Muslims living there.  Often, refugees of one ethnic group previously “cleansed” from their homes by other ethnic group are made to live in freshly “cleansed” territory of that other ethnic group.’

.

[Source: ^http://balkansnet.org/ethnicl.html]

.

In 2011 humanity continues to trash the sublime for a selfish vista

.


.


.

Further Reading:

.

[1]    ^http://treeshaverightstoo.com/

It’s not just humans who have rights, all beings do. The right not to be polluted is a right that belongs to us as well as to the Earth, to the air we breathe and to future generations. There are other rights which apply to us all, the problem is that they are not yet recognised internationally. But this is rapidly changing and you can find more information about the campaigns and progress of this fast developing arena of humanitarian and environmental law, called Earth Law.’

.

[3]    ‘Should Trees Have Standing? – Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects’, by Christopher Stone, ^http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic498371.files/Stone.Trees_Standing.pdf   [Read Article]

.

[2]    ^http://therightsfuture.com/t16-do-trees-have-rights/

.

[3]   ^http://northshorewoman.blogspot.com/2011/12/trees-have-rights-too.html

.

Eco-Christmas spirit – goodwill to Nature

Sunday, December 25th, 2011
Humpback Whale in a magnificent breach
(click photo to enlarge)
^http://rtseablog.blogspot.com/2011/09/bermuda-humpback-whale-sanctuary-noaa.html

.

Christmas is a time for goodwill and hope.

.

“There is joy in the companionship of others working to make a difference for future generations,” declares activist David Suzuki,  “and there is hope.  Each of us has the ability to act powerfully for change; together we can regain that ancient and sustaining harmony, in which human needs and the needs of all our (plant and animal) companions on the planet are held in balance with the sacred, self-renewing processes of Earth.”

.

We at The Habitat Advocate convey our goodwill and hope to those out there right now defending Nature.

We convey our goodwill and hope to the environmental activists in Tasmania’s wild defending threatened forests.

Activists of Still Wild Still Threatened  (SWST)
Camp Flozza, Upper Florentine Valley
Tasmania’s Southern Forests
^http://www.stillwildstillthreatened.org/

.

SWST advocates for the immediate formal protection of Tasmania’s precious Southern Forests using a combination of political and corporate lobbying, community education, research, exploration and frontline direct action. We also promote the creation of an equitable and environmentally sustainable forest industry in Tasmania. Protecting Tasmania’s ancient forests: a real climate change solution.

.

We at The Habitat Advocate convey our goodwill and hope to the environmental activists in the Southern Ocean defending threatened whales.

 

Captain Paul Watson and the crew of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS)
currently braving the freezing Southern Ocean south of Australia to defend whales from poachers.
^http://www.seashepherd.org/

.

Sea Shepherd’s mission is to end the destruction of habitat and slaughter of wildlife in the world’s oceans in order to conserve and protect ecosystems and species.

 

The meaning of Christmas has ancient Pagan origins pre-dating Christianity, coinciding with the Winter Solstice of the northern hemisphere celebrating the return of life at the beginning of winter’s decline.    [Source:  ^http://www.christmastreehistory.net/pagan]

Consistent with the original goodwill meaning of Christmas, we advocate the inclusion of Nature in this goodwill spirit:

  • That each us strives to do something every day for wildness.
  • That each us tries to practice simplicity and frugality. Conserve, reuse, and recycle to reduce pressures for resource extraction on remaining wildlands. Buy less. Play more.
  • That each us supports conservation organizations that champion wildness, especially those acquiring acreage for wildlands preservation.
.
[Source: ^http://naturepantheist.org/ecological.html]

.

Eco-Christmas spirit

.

As environmental activist David Suzuki advocates, “each of us has the ability to act powerfully for change”.  So we like the initiative of Melbourne-based company ‘Eco Christmas Trees‘. Eco Christmas Trees rents out ‘living growing trees providing the real Christmas experience without cutting down a tree‘.

Check out their website:  ^http://www.ecochristmastrees.com.au/

The real Christmas experience without cutting down a tree.

.

“What’s the use of a fine house if you haven’t got a tolerable planet to put it on?”

.

~ Henry David Thoreau, environmental activist, (1817 – 1862)]

.

Merry Yule!

.

error: Content is copyright protected !!